Skip to Main Content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.

Literature Reviews & Search Strategies

What is a Literature Review?

The exact process and structure will vary depending on the type of literature review you're doing, but in short:

"A literature review develops a case for a thesis based on a comprehensive understanding of the current knowledge of the topic. A literature review synthesizes current knowledge pertaining to the research question. This synthesis is the foundation that allows the researcher to build a convincing case."

- The Literature Review: Six Steps to Success

Why do a Literature Review?

A literature review is a way to identify:

  • important works and authors in the topic area;
  • trends and current issues in the topic area;
  • potential gaps in the literature;
  • a conceptual framework for your research;
  • divergent opinions on the topic;
  • demonstrate your understanding of the current state of the field through your synthesis of the sources you find.

- Based on the University of St. Thomas Writing a Literature Review Guide

How is it different from an Annotated Bibliography?

An annotated bibliography is a list of sources, each of which is summarized and evaluated individually. An annotated bibliography is a great early step in an evidence-gathering process; your annotations can be great notes to come back to later on.

Through a literature review you identify important themes within your topic/question, cite the sources that support each theme, and then write syntheses of what the literature says about each theme. A literature review requires a higher level of critical thinking and writing skills than an annotated bibliography.

Connect with the MCPHS Libraries via Social Media: Twitter Instagram